Tag: Pedro S. Urquijo

  • Against the Planetarization of the Metabolic Rift and of the Urban

    Against the Planetarization of the Metabolic Rift and of the Urban

    Against the Planetarization of the Metabolic Rift and of the Urban” (coauthord with Brian Napoletano, Brett Clark and Pedro S. Urquijo, Foster listed second), in Reimagining Urban Marxisms, ed. Francesco Biagi (London; Routledge, 2025).

    Reimagining Urban Marxisms

    ABSTRACT

    Both the urban and the metabolic rift have been recognized as planetary phenomena with worldwide implications. Underlying their historical conjuncture is the way the two are rooted in basic contradictions of the capital system–including town–country, domination-appropriation, and exchange value–use value–rendering them mutually reinforcing and co-constitutive. Thus, the looming threat of what French Marxist Henri Lefebvre referred to as the “planetarization of the urban” also represents a planetarization of the metabolic rift. Rather than a negation of the urban, the project of autogestion suggests that metabolic restoration lies in the reappropriation of space through urban society. This raises challenges of substantive equality, substantive democracy, and openness to the future, which also serve as orienting principles rooted in the socialist project. Although transforming these into a radical project of transition represents a monumental challenge, its urgent necessity becomes increasingly apparent with the growing stakes of our contemporary social-ecological crisis.

  • Henri Lefebvre’s Marxian Ecological Critique

    Henri Lefebvre’s Marxian Ecological Critique: Recovering a Foundational Contribution to Environmental Sociology” (coauthored with Brian M. Napoletano, Brett Clark & Pedro S. Urquijo), Environmental Sociology 6, no. 1 (2020): 31-41. DOI: 10.1080/23251042.2019.1670892. [PDF]

    French Marxist sociologist, Henri Lefebvre, was one of the foremost social theorists of the twentieth century, celebrated for his critiques of everyday life, urban revolution, and the production of space. We argue here that his mature work also encompassed a theory of ecological crisis, drawing directly on Marx’s theory of metabolic rift. In this conception, the dialectics of nature and society were subject to alienated capitalist accumulation, giving rise to metabolic rifts, epochal crises, and new historical moments of revolutionary praxis aimed at the metamorphosis of everyday life. Lefebvre thus ranks as one of the foundational contributors to environmental sociology, whose rich theoretical analysis offers the possibility of a wider social and ecological synthesis.

  • Making Space in Critical Environmental Geography for the Metabolic Rift

    Making Space in Critical Environmental Geography for the Metabolic Rift” (coauthored with Brian M. Napoletano, Brett Clark, Pedro S. Urquijo, Michael K. McCall & Jaime Paneque-Gálvez, Napoletano listed first), Annals of the American Association of Geographers, vol. 109, no. 6: 1811-1828, DOI: 10.1080/24694452.2019.1598841. [PDF]

    Marx’s concept of metabolic rift has emerged as a prominent theoretical framework with which to explain the socioecological crises of capitalism. Yet, despite its relevance to key concerns in critical environmental geography, it has remained marginal within the field. Here we address this by distinguishing between metabolic rift theory and two predominant Marxist approaches in environmental geography: the production-of-nature thesis and posthumanist world ecology. We follow this comparative assessment with a detailed analysis of metabolic rift theory and a brief overview of how the concept relates to key concerns in critical environmental geography. We conclude by discussing how a stronger engagement with the metabolic rift approach could benefit the field.